Monday, 12 September 2011

Jagland urges Europe to 'practice what it preaches' in the Mediterranean region

Secretary General Thorbjørn Jagland has challenged Europe to practice what it preaches in its relations with neighbouring countries in the Mediterranean region.

In his 9 September speech to the Bled Strategic Forum, Jagland expressed his fear that  Europe’s  neighbours might not heed calls for more tolerant and inclusive politics if it could not cope with its own multicultural societies.

Speech by Thorbjørn Jagland, Secretary General of the Council of Europe
'Search for a New "World Order" in the Mediterranean'
Bled Strategic Forum
9 September 2011

Distinguished participants, Ladies and Gentlemen, I always prepare for my participation at events such as this one. When I was asked to speak at the panel devoted to the search for a New World Order in the Mediterranean, I started by googling the title. This was only partially helpful.

According to Wikipedia, a broadly used yet seldom quoted source of facts, the term New World Order stands for:

Firstly, a system of teachings in Bahá'í Faith, believing in a God's divinely appointed scheme for the unification of mankind through the establishment of a world commonwealth based on principles of equity and justice.

Secondly, a conspiracy theory claiming that a secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world. Numerous historical and current events are seen as steps in an ongoing plot to achieve world domination through secret political gatherings and decision-making processes. This is indeed worrisome. I can just imagine what a bona fidae conspiracy theorist would think of our little gathering here in Bled.

Finally, and more reassuringly, the term New World Order has been used to refer to any new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power.
I would assume that it was this last notion our hosts had in mind for this panel, even if, upon reflexion, the two others are not as different as it may seem at first glance. The differences are more a matter of ideological perspective than substance.
Be it as it may, what started on 18 December last year in the streets of Tunis, and quickly spread to many countries across the region, clearly qualifies as a new period of history and a dramatic change.

But if history is in the making, it has not been made yet. The violence and destruction caused by the Gaddafi regime is only one example, the dramatic situation in Syria is another, showing us how volatile and dangerous the situation still is.

For all the countries in question the challenges which remain, including economic and social ones, are enormous. The key to the long-term sustainability of changes is the way in which these challenges are met. 
We should support the development of a system of government based on accountability, free elections, human rights and the rule of law. These are not European values, even if we often label them as such. They are universal values, originating from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. They are also a prerequisite for a progressive and successful society which can guarantee security, stability and prosperity to its people.

I often use the example of the freedom of expression which may be irritating to some, but its absence is harmful to all. Without critical voices, our societies have no effective protection against errors and abuse in the exercise of power.

The experience of the democratic transition in Central and Eastern Europe can provide a wealth of very interesting and valuable lessons. But we must take into account not only similarities, but also political, economic, social, institutional and cultural differences which exist between the two situations.

These differences cannot affect the ultimate objectives – the respect for universal values of democracy, human rights and the rule of law – but they have implications on how these objectives can and should most appropriately and effectively be pursued.

It was against this background that the Committee of Ministers at its meeting in Istanbul in May approved a new Council of Europe neighbourhood policy.
The underlying principle of the policy is based on the fact that the political changes which are taking place in several countries in the region are home-grown and spontaneous. This is a very important element of legitimacy and lasting popular support. Our relations with the countries concerned and our action should be perceived and accepted as genuine co-operation and assistance, not interference. The key to the success of our endeavour is respect. Respect for the people in the region, for their courage, for their ability and their right to decide about their own future.

But ultimately, the shape and the quality of the “New World Order” in the Mediterranean will not only depend on the developments at its southern shores, but equally so on the way Europe will be able to meet its own challenges.

People IN the region are listening to our message on democracy and human rights, but they also watch television and read newspapers about the way we apply these values when it comes to people coming FROM the region, be they recent migrants, long-term residents, or nationals in European countries.

Later this afternoon, a round table hosted by the President of Slovenia Danilo Türk will debate a report entitled “Living Together – Combining Diversity and Freedom in the 21 century”. This is a challenging, even provocative analysis of the way Europe handles, or mishandles, the issue of diversity in our societies.

The group which prepared the report was led by Joschka Fischer. Several of its prominent members, including our moderator, Edward Mortimer, are here in Bled to  take part in the round table. I invite you all to read the report, but for now, I would like to quote one sentence from its executive summary.

Here is what it says: ”discrimination and intolerance are widespread in Europe today, particularly against Roma and immigrants, as well as people of recent migrant background, who are often treated as foreigners even in countries where they are both natives and citizens”.

These types of observations are not often a part of our discussions on Europe’s relations with its neighbours. But they should be. They are directly relevant to our credibility and image. How can we expect our neighbours to follow the European liberal and tolerant model if we cannot cope with the issue of interculturalism ourselves?

In conclusion, I should like to return to Wikipedia and its definitions of today’s theme. I do not know much about the rest of their beliefs, but when it comes to the definition of the New World Order, I would say that the Bahai’ans got it about right. It should be about equity, justice and respect.

The challenge – and the message to my fellow Europeans - is to practice what you preach. 
Thank you.


  1. I think Thor Jagland got it about right. It should be about equity, justice and respect.

    The best beloved of all things in My sight is Justice; turn not away therefrom if thou desirest Me, and neglect it not that I may confide in thee. By its aid thou shalt see with thine own eyes and not through the eyes of others, and shalt know of thine own knowledge and not through the knowledge of thy neighbor. Ponder this in thy heart; how it behooveth thee to be. Verily justice is My gift to thee and the sign of My loving-kindness. Set it then before thine eyes."
    -- Bahá'u'lláh, Hidden Words

  3. Looking back at history, the politics of now are never necessarily the politics of tomorrow. Civilisation has always changed and evolved irresistibly towards a more global society, people just tend to think in terms of the systems they know well and presume they will always exist however flawed they are. What's more politicians elected for terms of only a few years have little incentive to strive towards longterm solutions to the world's problems.

    Achieving political and economic stability means starting with the basic universal principles of unity and justice and then building a society, rather than building a society which claims to work towards those principles. The well-being of mankind, its peace and security are unattainable unless and until its unity is firmly established.

    I'm glad Jagland has the guts to say to ask Europeans to practice what they preach and it's a lesson that is relevant far beyond our borders.

  4. The world is in greatest need of international peace. Until it is established, mankind will not attain composure and tranquility. It is necessary that the nations and governments organize an international tribunal to which all their disputes and differences shall be referred. The decision of that tribunal shall be final. Individual controversy will be adjudged by a local tribunal. International questions will come before the universal tribunal, and so the cause of warfare will be taken away. 'Abdul-Bahá

  5. I do believe that the world is one country and the folks are the citizen of it.
    The governments have to adapt this case carefully and do not loss their time any more.
    We do have need people with good visions to administrate the case on the right way.

  6. I liked the fair-minded and lucid preview summed by Jagland, to the forthcoming report and look forward to reading it. On the one hand in terms of technology changing the whole world, we hear the term 'one global village' yet on the other love and tolerance for all,are missing ingredients in the framework

  7. Doing abdominal exercise, such ascrunches, reverse bicycles and push-ups will help you have killer abs as theabdominal fat comes off, but other exercises should be included in yourroutine as well. With that, you may in fact be able to achieve the perfect abs after some point but this is often coincidentally left out of the advertisements.